Economic philosophy is Conservatives' big weakness

Published Saturday October 11th, 2008
A12

Many of us watched the election debates a week ago; the Canadian version, not the American. All I saw of the American ones was a bit of the vice-presidential debate. The most powerful nation in the world is rapidly becoming the second-most-powerful nation in the world and a failed state to boot. It has opted to risk the possibility of a mindless hockey mom as its president. It is further proof, if proof be needed, that our civilization (so-called) is in a state of irreversible decline.

Our debates were like a breath of fresh air. Five very able people debated the issues forcefully, courteously and intelligently. They were all well informed and argued cogently. Their individual views (and mine) aside, any one of them would make a reasonably competent prime minister. We have real choice. It made me truly thankful for the existence of the 49th parallel.

But we are not without our problems. The possibility of the Harper juggernaut rolling to a majority on Oct. 14th is scary. For one thing, the man is authoritarian and seem to have a cold, calculating disdain of all views except his own.

Four of our leaders would leave us with a country that is still recognizable as Canada; one wouldn't - Stephen Harper. It used to be that the NDP (and the communists) were the people who governed from a set of rules and principles in their little red book. Now it is the theo-Cons.

We should ask why Joe Clark and the other mainstream Conservative big names of recent years are not part of the Harper team. The answer is simple enough; they are moderate conservatives and don't subscribe to the extreme policies of the Harperites.

Remember what the Conservatives used to call themselves? The Progressive Conservatives. Harper changed the name. There would be nothing progressive about his party. It has become reactionary to the core. In all of its history, Canada has been a middle-of-the-road political nation. Harper has changed that. Now it is bifurcated - centre right and extreme right with smatterings out on the left.

Have we ever seen a government so completely in the thrall of the Americans? Harper even apes Bush with his little maple leaf lapel pin. George Bush tells the world that the economic fundamentals of the U.S. are good, and weeks later it teeters on the edge of economic disintegration. Harper tries to assure the world that Canada's economic fundamentals are solid, and inevitably we are seeing the same disintegration here.

This man wants our vote on Tuesday and thinks that by wearing a baby blue sweater we will forget the glacier-blue eyes. That insults our intelligence. As does the fact that he obviously thinks we forget about his Kyoto statement: "Kyoto is essentially a socialist scheme to suck money out of the wealth-producing nations." He only changed his tune when the polls showed that Canadians were indeed concerned about the environment and Kyoto.

We don't forget, either that after sending our troops to Afghanistan he tried to ban the media from taking photos of returning coffins.

He has had a spat going for years with Newfoundland Premier Danny Williams and carried the hostility over when he ignored a constitutional convention by appointing a Nova Scotian to the Supreme Court recently. It should have been Newfoundland's turn. Newfoundlanders now has another reason to love him.

His relationship with the press has been about as bad as it has ever been between a prime minister and a press gallery. They clearly dislike him and enjoy getting under his skin by asking difficult questions. Apparently it is easily done. For his part, he seems to only want the easy questions lobbed to him by friendly press.

Maybe it goes deeper. He has sacked or caused three communications directors to resign.

He passed legislation calling for fixed-date elections and promptly ignored the legislation by calling the current election, saying Parliament was not working. He conveniently ignored the fact that if this was the case, the manual his party issued on how to disrupt the parliamentary committee procedures no doubt had a lot to do with it.

He has probably achieved a better relationship with the U.S than have previous prime ministers, but it hasn't resulted in any noticeable benefits to Canada. He has used a broad sword on culture expenses. Given half a chance, I don't doubt he would privatize Medicare. And, he has made offensive comments about the Maritimes and its "culture of defeat."

Stephen Harper is the brightest prime minister we have had since Trudeau - some argue, "including Trudeau-" but he has got it wrong. He believes to his core that government is the problem and the market is the solution. Blinded by his own dogma, he can't see that the unregulated market truly is the problem this time around. Bright though he is, he will never learn.

What we have to do on Tuesday is ensure that he doesn't have an opportunity to wreak his havoc on the country for another four years.

Max Wolfe is a freelance writer who resides in St. Andrews.

Please Log In or Register FREE

You are currently not logged into this site. Please log in or register for a FREE ONE Account.
Logged in visitors may comment on articles, enter contests, manage home delivery holds and much more online. Your ONE Account grants you access to features and content across the entire CanadaEast Network of sites.

Comments (14)

All comments are subject to the site Terms of Use. For a full commenting tutorial click here.

Our editorial team relies on filtering technology and our visitor community to identify inappropriate comments. In the event that a site user has submitted offensive content that has evaded our filter, please select the option to Flag As Inappropriate presented within the comment. Thank you for helping to keep this site clean.

Great article and right on.
4
Thumbs Up
16
Thumbs Down
Flag as Inappropriate
Flag as Inappropriate
J. R, Moncton, NB on 11/10/08 11:49:58 AM AST
JR is a paid LIEberal hack.
16
Thumbs Up
5
Thumbs Down
Flag as Inappropriate
Flag as Inappropriate
B Hanley, Calgary on 11/10/08 12:33:42 PM AST
Feel free to dispute any of the points Wolfe made, Hanley, or are ad hominem attacks all that you have.
12
Thumbs Up
12
Thumbs Down
Flag as Inappropriate
Flag as Inappropriate
Seamus O'Malley, ... on 12/10/08 02:20:17 AM AST
Funny how Wolfe brings up Kyoto, the LIEberals were in power for 13 years and did absolutely nothing about it except have the minister in charge of that portfolio name his dog Kyoto.

This past week, Canada has been named as having the most sound banking system in the world even though Dion and Taliban Jack are screaming the sky is falling. Also, world economic experts have stated that Prime Minister Harper's reaction to the world economic crisis is far and away the best course of action to take, slow and steady without any major kneejerk reactions.
13
Thumbs Up
3
Thumbs Down
Flag as Inappropriate
Flag as Inappropriate
B Hanley, Calgary on 12/10/08 08:13:51 PM AST
Funny how Haney mentions Canada's great banking system which is thanks to Martin and Chretien. Name one thing that Harper did to help cary Canada through this storm.
11
Thumbs Up
13
Thumbs Down
Flag as Inappropriate
Flag as Inappropriate
Seamus O'Malley, ... on 12/10/08 09:39:04 PM AST
For starters, he didn't make any idiotic kneejerk reaction like the Nutty Professor and Taliban Jack are proposing.
12
Thumbs Up
3
Thumbs Down
Flag as Inappropriate
Flag as Inappropriate
B Hanley, Calgary on 12/10/08 09:45:05 PM AST
The question was: what DID he do? Not: what DIDN'T he do?
10
Thumbs Up
9
Thumbs Down
Flag as Inappropriate
Flag as Inappropriate
Seamus O'Malley, ... on 12/10/08 10:00:54 PM AST
What he did do is stick with the slow and steady approach of not overreacting. Funny how LIEberal supporters like O'Malley can't handle the fact that Harper is actually doing what is best for all of Canada.
11
Thumbs Up
2
Thumbs Down
Flag as Inappropriate
Flag as Inappropriate
B Hanley, Calgary on 12/10/08 10:16:33 PM AST
Again: What did he do? Do you have an answer or are you only responses going to be those typical CPC rhetorical slogans?
9
Thumbs Up
8
Thumbs Down
Flag as Inappropriate
Flag as Inappropriate
Seamus O'Malley, ... on 12/10/08 10:49:29 PM AST
Omalley, you obviously buy whatever the liberals sell. I have been preaching to the choir for years about this subject. When Paul Martin balanced the budget back in 1994 the house gave him a standing ovation. And like usual the liberals took the credit for someone elses work.

But what the people of canada failed to realize is. Paul Martin nor Jean Cretian had anything to do with balancing the budget. It was all done for them. How so you ask . Because of Brian Mulroney´s creation of that evil tory tax that the lieberals had promised to eliminate if elected. But instead they just took the credit for the tax when it did excatly what Brian Mulroney promised it would do.Balance the budget and turn a surplus to pay down the national debt.

Just like the liberal supporters now who blame harper for Afghanistan. When everyone knows it was Chretian who put us there, Martin who left us there and Manley who recommend we stay there. All Liberals. Sometimes the truth hurts doesn´t it.
9
Thumbs Up
2
Thumbs Down
Flag as Inappropriate
Flag as Inappropriate
Joe Doucette, Hampton on 13/10/08 08:22:42 AM AST
Advertisement
Advertisement

Search Articles